A recurring argument recorded in attributable statements that does not fit another published category.
“Let's honor our veterans and our heritage while rejecting further financial harm from this bully legislative mandate that has passed unfunded costs on to our rural counties.”
Addie Best · May 5, 2026 · Itasca · Statement record · View case and source →
“There is substantial public cost associated with making this change that does not advance the public interest.”
Isanti City Council · March 14, 2024 · Isanti city · Statement record · View case and source →
“There is a substantial public cost associated with making this change that does not advance the public interest, including every deputy badge, seals in every courtroom and county board rooms across the state.”
Hubbard County Board · February 8, 2024 · Hubbard · Statement record · View case and source →
Resolution 202404 adopted in opposition to proposed flag/seal changes: existing flag and seal depict agriculture, Native American heritage, and co-existence as part of Minnesota history.
Nobles County Board · January 23, 2024 · Nobles · Statement record · View case and source →
Resolution 24-CB-12 (Opposition to Redesign of Minnesota State Flag and Seal): the flag and seal contain historical information on farming background and Native American heritage; substantial public cost does not advance the public interest. Krueger moved, Nagel seconded, motion carried unanimously.
Mcleod County Board · January 16, 2024 · McLeod · Statement record · View case and source →
Resolution 2024-7 (Resolution in Opposition to Redesigning the State Flag and Seal): urges legislative delegation and Governor to reject SERC work and retain existing state seal and flag. Motion by Kangas, seconded by Noon; roll call 5-0.
Wadena County Board · January 16, 2024 · Wadena · Statement record · View case and source →
