Research & Evidence
A systematic presentation of verified local government actions, recorded roll-call votes, and attributable public statements documented across Minnesota.
What Actions Did Governments Take?
Formal local government actions categorized by substantive intent. Resolutions to display the former flag or oppose the current design constitute the largest recorded categories.
View accessible data table
| Action Type | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution to display former state flag | 7 | 32% |
| Resolution opposing adoption of current flag | 6 | 27% |
| Resolution to display current state flag | 3 | 14% |
| Letter sent to state government | 2 | 9% |
| Action opposing redesign process and costs | 1 | 5% |
| Council action concerning state flag display | 1 | 5% |
| Resolution to display both flags | 1 | 5% |
| Resolution not to display either state flag | 1 | 5% |
When Did Actions Occur? (Documented Activity Timeline)
Actions cluster in two distinct periods: the months leading up to the May 11, 2024 state flag transition date, and municipal sessions during spring 2026.
View accessible data table
| Month | Documented Actions |
|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | 3 |
| Feb 2024 | 2 |
| Mar 2024 | 2 |
| Apr 2024 | 1 |
| May 2024 | 3 |
| Jun 2024 | 2 |
| Feb 2026 | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | 4 |
| May 2026 | 4 |
Recorded Outcomes
How documented government proposals and motions concluded in the official record.
View accessible data table
| Outcome | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Adopted | 18 | 82% |
| Tabled / Removed from agenda | 2 | 9% |
| No formal adoption | 1 | 5% |
| Rejected | 1 | 5% |
Jurisdictions in Dataset
Geographic entity distribution among verified case files.
View accessible data table
| Level | Cases | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Cities | 13 | 59% |
| Counties | 9 | 41% |
Arguments in Attributable Statements
Frequency of MNFlag standardized coding categories across all verified statements. Categories can overlap and do not represent a public opinion poll.
View accessible data table
| Category | Statements | Share |
|---|---|---|
| History & Tradition | 16 | 30% |
| Indigenous Imagery | 9 | 17% |
| Official Status | 9 | 17% |
| Local Control | 8 | 15% |
| Redesign Process | 8 | 15% |
| Cost | 6 | 11% |
| Unity vs Division | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| State Government Criticism | 3 | 6% |
| Aesthetics | 2 | 4% |
| Voter Referendum | 2 | 4% |
| Rural Representation | 1 | 2% |
| Somalia Comparison | 1 | 2% |
Evidence Documentation
Every case action is verified against official municipal records. Direct meeting packets and secondary press reporting are attached where available:
Relationships Between Cases
Documented transmission pathways and shared resolution text connecting decisions across Minnesota jurisdictions:
See all individual actions in chronological order → What happened in your jurisdiction →