Skip to main content
MNFlag Research Category

Unity vs Division

A recurring argument recorded in attributable statements that does not fit another published category.

15 coded statements · 13 speakers · 5 jurisdictions

This is MNFlag research coding and is not necessarily language used by the speaker. Coding does not imply overall political ideology or motive.

Verified Evidence

Statements using this category

Direct quotation
“I think that by entertaining this motion, you are being divisive. You and I can have a conversation and we can agree to disagree, and I think that when our government leaders are not standing up for decisions that have been made as a whole for this state.”

Adrianne Reiners · May 19, 2026 · Itasca · Statement record · View case and source →

Direct quotation
“This continues to divide our community. — Sam St. John, speaking about experiences growing up Native in the city”

Sam St. John · May 7, 2026 · Hastings city · Statement record · View case and source →

Appears across documented records:
Direct quotation
“Some residents feel a deep connection to the historic flag. Others believe that change reflects who we are today. Both viewpoints come from a place of care for our state and its identity.”

Mary D Fasbender · May 4, 2026 · Hastings city · Statement record · View case and source →

Attributed paraphrase

If the council votes to adopt the old flag, we're sending a message that we are not a united part of the state of Minnesota. The imagery on the old flag is a reminder of historical oppression and forced displacement of Indigenous communities.

Mary T'Kach · April 27, 2026 · Inver Grove Heights city · Statement record · View case and source →

Analytical Relationships

Categories appearing alongside this one

These categories appear on some of the same coded statements in MNFlag's database. Co-occurrence reflects multiple themes in a single statement; it does not establish related beliefs, ideology, or motive.